Merchants' & Manufacturers' Traffic Ass'n v. United States

Good Law
231 F. 292·1915 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1688
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaDecember 15, 1915No. 191California4,433 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

The petitioners are applying to this court, upon the bill of corqplaint and affidavits, for an interlocutory injunction to restrain in part an order of the Interstate Commerce Commission, dated April 30, 1915, and the tariff filed by certain of the *294 transcontinental rail carriers pursuant to said order (Supplement 16 to Transcontinental Freight Bureau West-Bound Tariff No. 1-N), in so *far as the said order charges for west-bound transcontinental commodities destined to Sacramento, Stockton, San Jose, and Santa Clara any greater amount than is charged for the transportation of like commodities to San Francisco or Oakland.

[ 1 ] A preliminary motion to dismiss the bill has been made by the United States on grounds that appear to be sufficiently stated in the objections that the petitioners do not bring the suit as common carriers or as shippers; that they have no such interest in the orders of the Interstate Commerce Commission sought to be annulled and enjoined as to enable them to maintain the suit; that it does not appear that they will sustain irreparable injury, or any injury, by reason of any orders of the Commission made subject of complaint; and that the petitioners…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.