Titlow

Titlow v. Sundquist

Good Law
148 C.C.A. 379·234 F. 613·1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2123
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 7, 1916No. 2652California554 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Ross, J.

The appellee Sundquist brought this suit in the court below against the receiver of the United States National Bank of Centralia, state of Washington, to recover $1,296 alleged to have been deposited by the plaintiff in the action with the defendant bank under an express agreement between the parties that the bank would pay it to one Izella J. Smith in satisfaction of a note executed to her by one Gustafson for $1,200, upon which there was also then due $96 in interest, secured by a mortgage upon certain lands, and under which agreement the said money was not to be used by the bank for any other purpose. Gustafson and Miss Smith were also made parties defendant to the action, both of whom, however, at the trial disclaimed any interest in the fund in question.

The evidence in the case is very brief, and there is no substantial conflict in it. It shows that on August 31, 1914, the appellee Sundquist had on deposit in the bank $3,000, for which he held three certificates of deposit in equal amounts. Gustafson, the maker of the note and mortgage to Miss Smith, was his son-in-law, and he wished to pay off that indebtedness. On the day mentioned he went to the bank, taking with him…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.