In re Stowe

Good Law
235 F. 463·1916 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1388
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 1916No. 10215California508 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Dooling, J.

In the early part of June, 1916, Herbert A. Stowe, the bankrupt herein, made to Fillmore C. Marks an assignment for the benefit of his creditors. This was to be effective if all of the creditors assented thereto. Some of them did not do so, and the bankrupt then filed his petition and schedules and was duly adjudicated a bankrupt. Lafayette J. Smallpage was the attorney for the assignee, and when the bankruptcy proceedings were inaugurated he sent out to the creditors a circular letter in which he says;

*464 “We desire to represent yoú at the election of the trustee, and will do so without charge, provided you execute the enclosed proof of debt.”

At this time the assignee had collected a considerable sum o£ money, for which he would necessarily have to account to the trustee who might later be selected. In response to this letter a number of creditors sent their claims with power of attorney to Smallpage. These claims were afterwards turned over to R. C. Pardoe, who attempted to vote them at the election for trustee. The referee refused to permit them to be voted, on the ground that the attorney for the assignee was endeavoring in this manner to control the election of trustee.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.