Shepard

Shepard v. United States

Good Law
149 C.C.A. 283·236 F. 73·1916 U.S. App. LEXIS 2249
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitOctober 4, 1916No. 2669California2,100 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

(after stating the facts as above). 1. The indictment in this case contains but one count. The errors assigned relate to the overruling of a demurrer to the indictment, the giving of certain instructions to the jury, the refusal of the court to give certain instructions- requested by the defendant, the denial of the motion of defendant for a new trial, and tire denial of a motion in ar'rest of judgment.

Section 37 of the Penal Code of the United States (Act of March 4, 1909, c. 321; 35 Stat. 1088 , 1096) provides:

[1] Section 1 of the act of January 17, 1914, c. 9 ( 38 Stat. 275 , 276) provides:

Section 2 of the same act provides:

Section 3 provides:

The motion in arrest of judgment, is based upon the objection that the last-named act is unconstitutional in so far as it attempts to make penal the keeping and transportation of opium within the limits of a state, being in conflict with the police power of the state and not within the powers delegated to the United States. In Brolan v. United States, 236 U. S. 216, 222 , 35 Sup. Ct. 285, 59 L. Ed. 544 , this objection to the statute was held by the Supreme Court to be so utterly devoid of merit as to be frivolous.

[2] 2. The…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.