Equitable Trust Co. of New York v. Western Pac. Ry. Co.

Good Law
236 F. 814·1916 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1334
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaSeptember 5, 1916No. 169California419 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Fleet, J.

On the hearing of the settlement of the accounts of the receivers herein and the allowance of their compensation and that of the several counsel concerned, one of the applications was by Pillsbury, Madison & Sutro for the allowance to them of a fee for their services rendered in the litigation to certain minority bondholders, to 'be chargeable upon the corpus of the fund in the *815 hands of the special master applicable to the payment of bonds held by those holders not participating in the reorganization of the defendant company, upon the theory that the services performed had redounded to the benefit of all such nonconsenting bondholders, whether appearing or not, and thereby rendered such compensation a proper charge upon such fund. Objection was made by counsel for the plaintiff, based upon the contention that any compensation awarded for such services could only properly be paid out of the moneys from such fund payable to the holders of bonds represented by the intervener for whom counsel specially appeared.

The court being in doubt, the question was reserved, but an examination of the decree of confirmation of sale heretofore made herein by Judge Dooling at the instance of…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.