Edwards

Edwards v. Bodkin

Good Law
241 F. 931·1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1352
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaApril 16, 1917No. C-55California1,435 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Bledsoe, J.

(after stating the facts as above). In this case, plaintiff, who appears in propria persona, has imposed considerable labor upon the court because of the undue prolixity with which he has clothed both his complaint and his argument in support thereof. However, the court has endeavored, as best it might, to give all of the matters submitted to it the very careful consideration which their importance, to the parties at least, demanded.

Without going into a lengthy statement either of facts or conclusions, because -of pressure of other duties, it will suffice to say that plaintiff presents, as I see it, two reasons why defendant should be declared to be a trustee for him of the land heretofore patented by the United States: Eirst, that the Department of the Interior, without right and contrary to law, extended the so-called preference right of defendant, earned after successful termination of contest, beyond the 30-day period provided by the statute (21 Stat. at L. 140), so as to entitle defendant to have and take advantage of such preferential right after a restoration from withdrawal of the lands affected; and secondly, that in spite of the protest of plaintiff, upon…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.