McKinney v. United States Nat. Bank of Centralia

Good Law
154 C.C.A. 640·242 F. 48·1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1859
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 1917No. 2879California1,391 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Gilbert, J.

(after stating the facts as above). The account between the Olympia bank and the Centralia bank shows the following: That the Centralia bank, between August 20th and September 9th, and including those dates, received in cash from the-Olympia bank $38,498.91, all of which was sent to Seattle and Tacoma banks at the instance of the Centralia bank, except $2,203.91, which was sent to the Centralia bank, and that between August 20th and September 17tb the Olympia bank received from the Centralia bank $12,500. This result is reached after eliminating from one side of the account the fictitious charge of $48,000 against the Olympia bank, representing the color of credit obtained in the Centraba bank by that bank, and from the other side of the account $12,500 and $24,-050, which took the form of drafts for the payment of Hays’ indebtedness on his notes, and $9,500, representing the three Blumauer notes, which never came into the possession of the Olympia bank. With the elimination of these false items, the balance stands in favor of the Olympia bank in the sum of $25,998.91, as found by the court below.

[1-3] We agree with the court below that the authority of the Olympia bank to open…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.