Pickens

Pickens v. Merriam

Good Law
155 C.C.A. 139·242 F. 363·1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1888
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 21, 1917No. 2783California2,916 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

(after stating the facts as above). D The statutory period in which an action may be brought in California for relief on the ground of fraud is three years. The appellees invoke this statute, and the analogous doctrine of laches in equity for a corresponding period, as a bar to this cause of action. But the cause of action in-such case is not deemed to have accrued until the discovery by the aggrieved party of the facts constituting the fraud or mistake. Section 338, subd. 4, California Code of Civil Procedure. This last provision is derived from the principles of equity jurisdiction. Bailey v. Glover, 88 U. S. (21 Wall.) 342, 348 , 22 L. Ed. 636 .

Ferdinand Fensky died intestate in the county of Dos Angeles, Cal., on August 7, 1903, leaving property in California and in Topeka, Kan~ *367 The intestate died without issue, but he left a widow, Jeanette Fensky, and other heirs at law, including the complainants, who were his sisters. On September 9, 1903, M. T. Campbell was appointed administrator of the estate in Kansas, by the probate court of Shawnee county, and on October 15, 1903, Jeanette Fensky, the widow was appointed administratrix of the estate in California, by the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.