United States v. Brookshire Oil Co.

Good Law
242 F. 718·1917 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 1258
United States District Court, Southern District of CaliforniaJune 8, 1917Nos. A-34—A-36California2,074 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Bean, J.

(sitting by special assignment). These three suits involve the northeast, northwest, and southeast quarters of section 24, township 31 south, range 22 east, M. D. M., in the state of California. The land in question is oil-bearing, and is included within the area described in presidential withdrawal order of September 27, 1909.

On November IS, 1908, Mr. E. D. Burge posted on each quarter section a notice prepared by himself, purporting to be on behalf of eight named locaters, evidencing an intention to claim the same under the placer mining laws, and caused such notices to be recorded. The alleged locators were principally relatives of Burge and nonresidents of the state. Burge had no previous authority from them to make such locations, and they did not know of the posting of the notices until after he had contracted for the disposition of the locations. On December 23, 1908, Burge, without consulting the alleged locators or obtaining authority from them, and without their knowledge, entered into a contract in his own name (which recites that he was the owner of the property described and was desirous of having it developed and proved to contain petroleum) with the defendant…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.