New York, N. H. & H. R. v. Ballou & Wright

Good Law
155 C.C.A. 450·242 F. 862·1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 1950
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitJune 6, 1917No. 2853California1,707 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Morrow, J.

1. This is an action brought by the petitioner, a corporation, under section 16 of the act to regulate commerce, approved February 4, 1887 ( 24 Stat. 379 ), as amended by Act March 2, 1889, c. 382, § 5, 25 Stat. 859 , Act June 29, 1906, c. 3591, § 5, 34 Stat. 590 , and Act June 18, 1910, c. 309, § 13, 36 Stat. 554 (Comp. St. 1916, § 8584), to recover from the respondents, as common carriers engaged in interstate commerce, damages awarded to the petitioner by the Interstate Commerce Commission on account of unjust and unreasonable rates charged and collected from the petitioner for the transportation of certain specified quantities of motorcycles in carload lots from Armory, Mass., to Portland, Or.

It is alleged by the petitioner, in substance, that upon a hearing before the Interstate Commerce Commission it was found that the commodity rate charged and collected by the respondents from the petitioner for services rendered in the transportation of certain shipments of motorcycles was unjust, unreasonable, and excessive to the extent that it exceeded the first-class rate in effect at the time the shipments were made, and that the petitioner was damaged to the extent of the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.