Bowers

Bowers v. United States

Good Law
157 C.C.A. 89·244 F. 641·1917 U.S. App. LEXIS 2041
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 4, 1917No. 2571California3,508 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Hunt, J.

(after stating the facts as above). [1,2] Counsel for defendant has earnestly contended that the evidence was insufficient to sustain a verdict. One of the witnesses for the government testified to this effect: That he was a farmer and mechanic, and about 1909 he bought seven acres of this banana land from C. P. Bowers & Co.; that his transaction was with C. P. Bowers, to whom he paid $1,000 on the purchase; that there was $400 still due, and he sent an agent to Bowers to endeavor to buy only five acres, but failed to adjust the matter as desired, and thereafter paid the $400 still due to Bowers; that he dealt principally with Gillespie, an agent of Bowers ; that he received certain circulars through the mail before he made the purchase and a contract, and that he discussed the contract with Bowers, to whom he paid the money in June or July, 1909. The contract is a receipt of a deposit to secure the described quantity of land in the “C. P. Bowers & Co. Banana Plantation,” etc., subject to certain conditions. It is recited that, payment having been made, the property will he granted “by good and sufficient deed of conveyance, the above-named lessee grantor furnishing unlimited…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.