Las Vegas Local Joint Executive Board of Culinary Workers & Bartenders v. Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc.

Good Law
383 F.2d 667·66 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2351·1967 U.S. App. LEXIS 5033
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitSeptember 27, 1967No. 21349California489 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Merrill, J.

Appellants commenced this action to compel arbitration under § 301 of the Labor Management Relations Act, 29 U.S.C. § 185 .

For many years appellant unions have jointly bargained with a multiemployer bargaining association of Las Vegas, Nevada, resort hotels, presently represented by the Nevada Industrial Council. Appellee Las Vegas Hacienda, Inc., is a member of that association. Appellee Casino Operations, Inc., operates the casino at the Hacienda but is not a member of the association. Appellants contend that Casino Operations was either owned, operated or substantially controlled by Hacienda and, under the terms of the collective bargaining agreement with the resort hotels, 1 was therefore a party to and bound by that agreement.

So contending, appellants sought to secure compliance by Casino Operations with contract provisions respecting change girls and booth cashiers. When they were unsuccessful they requested adjustment and arbitration pursuant to the terms of the contract. Failing to secure satisfactory adjustment of the dispute, appellants brought this action to compel arbitration.

The District Court found that Casino Operations was not owned, operated or substantially…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.