Miller ex rel. National Labor Relations Board v. Hotel & Restaurant Employees & Bartenders Union, Local 2

Good Law
605 F. Supp. 573·119 L.R.R.M. (BNA) 2560·1985 U.S. Dist. LEXIS 23698
United States District Court, Northern District of CaliforniaJanuary 3, 1985No. C-84-6382 TEHCalifornia5,370 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Henderson, J.

FINDINGS OF FACT AND CONCLUSIONS OF LAW

This case came to be heard upon the verified Petition of Robert H. Miller, Regional Director of Region 20 of the National Labor Relations Board, herein called “Petitioner” or “Board”. The Board’s Petition, supported by affidavits and exhibits, seeks an injunction abating alleged unfair labor practices, pursuant to Section 10(l) of the National Labor Relations Act, as amended, 29 U.S.C. § 151 , et seq., herein called the “Act”, pending final disposition of the Board’s unfair labor practice com *575 plaint. The underlying unfair labor practice complaint alleges that the Respondent in this case, Hotel and Restaurant Employees and Bartenders Union, Local 2, Hotel Employees and Restaurant Employees International Union, AFL-CIO, herein called “Respondent”, “the Union” or “Local 2”, engaged in unfair labor practices in violation of Section 8(b)(4)(i)(ii)(B) of the Act, in the course of picketing at or near the business location of the charging party, Scoma’s Restaurant Inc., herein referred to as “Scoma’s” or the “charging party”. In opposition to the Board’s Petition for a Section 10(Z) injunction, Respondent filed a memorandum of points and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.