National Labor Relations Board v. Southern California Pipe Trades District Council No. 16 of United Ass'n

Good Law
449 F.2d 668
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitAugust 25, 1971Nos. 26570, 26572California2,271 words

Opinion

lead Opinion

Byrne, J.

During its contractual negotiations with Aero Plumbing Company (the Company) the Southern California Pipe Trades District No. 16 of the United Association (the District Council) insisted the collective bargaining agreement include provisos for (1) the posting of a performance bond by the Company, (2) the appointment of the Plumbing-Heating and Piping Employers Council of Southern California, Inc. (the Employers Council) as the Company’s agent for the purpose of collective bargaining and adjustment of grievances, (3) the payment of money to an industry promotion fund and (4) the application of the contract to owners and supervisors. Three years later the United Association of Journeymen and Apprentices of the Plumbing and Pipe Fitting Industry of the United States and Canada, Local No. 280 (Local 280) was equally intransigent about the said provisions being included in any collective bargaining agreement entered into with the Company. The National Labor Relations Board (the Board) held that the intransigence of the District Council and Local 280 constituted a refusal to bargain, a violation of Section 8(b) (3) of the National Labor Relations Act (the Act). 1 *670 The Board further…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.