22:I[98912,["/_next/static/chunks/0asocxi83kb~5.js","/_next/static/chunks/0n4z.7yu76je-.js","/_next/static/chunks/0eyt_ou8dj52g.js","/_next/static/chunks/01bcia3bjqt9z.js","/_next/static/chunks/15egrlmmf_yst.js"],"CaseDetailGate"] 23:T50e,ORDER The appellees’ Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED. The Opinion previously filed on July 29, 1991, and reported at 939 F.2d 847 , is WITHDRAWN. ORDER We have ordered that our opinion, Alexander v. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc., 939 F.2d 847 (9th Cir.1991), be withdrawn. In the opinion, we relied on allegations in the Alexanders’ complaint to overcome statements in the supplemental declaration of William T. Martin, Associate General Counsel for Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. and their subsidiary corporations Edge-water Hotel Corporation and Colorado Belle Corporation. In his declaration, Martin stated: Supplemental Declaration at 15, para. 2 (emphasis added). In our opinion, we said: Alexander, 939 F.2d at 853-54 . However, this circuit has held that for purposes of personal jurisdiction, “we may not assume the truth of allegations in a pleading which are contradicted by affidavit.” Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Assoc., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1284 (9th Cir.1977) (citing Taylor v. Portland Paramount Corp., 383 F.2d 634, 639 (9th Cir.1967)). The Alexanders’ allegations are contradicted by Martin’s affidavit, which states that the Edgewater Hotel Corporation is the sole owner and operator of the pontoon boat. We now AFFIRM as to all defendants.24:T542,

ORDER

The appellees’ Petition for Rehearing is GRANTED. The Opinion previously filed on July 29, 1991, and reported at 939 F.2d 847 , is WITHDRAWN.

ORDER

We have ordered that our opinion, Alexander v. Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc., 939 F.2d 847 (9th Cir.1991), be withdrawn.

In the opinion, we relied on allegations in the Alexanders’ complaint to overcome statements in the supplemental declaration of William T. Martin, Associate General Counsel for Circus Circus Enterprises, Inc. and their subsidiary corporations Edge-water Hotel Corporation and Colorado Belle Corporation. In his declaration, Martin stated:

Supplemental Declaration at 15, para. 2 (emphasis added).

In our opinion, we said:

Alexander, 939 F.2d at 853-54 .

However, this circuit has held that for purposes of personal jurisdiction, “we may not assume the truth of allegations in a pleading which are contradicted by affidavit.” Data Disc, Inc. v. Systems Technology Assoc., Inc., 557 F.2d 1280, 1284 (9th Cir.1977) (citing Taylor v. Portland Paramount Corp., 383 F.2d 634, 639 (9th Cir.1967)). The Alexanders’ allegations are contradicted by Martin’s affidavit, which states that the Edgewater Hotel Corporation is the sole owner and operator of the pontoon boat.

We now AFFIRM as to all defendants.