Asongakap

Asongakap v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202321-431California1,025 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARLVINE NKEMASONG No. 21-431

ASONGAKAP,

Agency No. A213-189-689 Petitioner,

v. MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 18, 2023 San Francisco, California

Before: VANDYKE and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL,** District Judge.

Petitioner Marlvine Nkemasong Asongakap seeks review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming the decision of the Immigration

Judge (IJ) denying asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of **

Kansas, sitting by designation.

1 Convention Against Torture (CAT). We have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252

and deny the petition.

Where, as here, “the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.