Berry
Berry v. Frazier
Opinion
Opinion
Petrou, J.
Filed 4/28/23
CERTIFIED FOR PUBLICATION
IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA
FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT
DIVISION THREE
RYAN BERRY,
Plaintiff and Appellant, v. A164168
JEFFERY R. FRAZIER, DVM,
(County and City of San Francisco Defendant and Respondent. Super. Ct. No. CGC20587086)
Ryan Berry sued Jeffery R. Frazier, a Doctor of Veterinary Medicine, for nominal and punitive damages based on the circumstances surrounding the euthanasia of her cat. 1 The gravamen of the operative pleading (the first amended complaint, hereafter FAC) is that Berry secured Frazier’s services to perform a humane euthanasia on her cat. Instead, and without Berry’s informed consent, Frazier performed the euthanasia by means of an unnecessary and unjustified intracardiac injection, resulting in a horrific and painful death for her cat and great emotional distress to Berry. The trial court granted
1 The FAC also named as defendants Vetted Petcare CA, Inc., a California Corporation, Vetted Petcare, Inc., a Delaware Corporation, and two corporate officers (hereafter Vetted). The causes of action against these parties have been dismissed without…