Ryckman

Ryckman v. Drexler CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaApril 28, 2023B319664California5,159 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weingart, J.

Filed 4/28/23 Ryckman v. Drexler CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

GERALD OWEN RYCKMAN et al., B319664

Plaintiffs and Appellants, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21STCV22674) v.

DAVID DREXLER et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Malcolm Mackey, Judge. Affirmed. Gerald Owen Ryckman and Judith Lorraine Ryckman, in pro. per., for Plaintiffs and Appellants. Schwimer Weinstein, Mitchell E. Rosensweig and Michael E. Schwimer for Defendants and Respondents. ____________________ This appeal arises out of a series of legal disputes that began with a disagreement concerning the ownership of an office building. In November 2015, respondents…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.