Carpio

Carpio v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitApril 28, 202322-1025California919 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS APR 28 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

BENJIE MARK VALENCIA CARPIO, No. 22-1025 Agency No. Petitioner, A062-864-448 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 17, 2023 San Francisco, California

Before: VANDYKE and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and VRATIL, District Judge.**

Benjie Mark Valencia Carpio, a native of the Philippines, seeks review of

a Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) decision affirming the Immigration

Judge’s (IJ) initial decision that Carpio was removable based on his “attempted

lewdness with a child” offense under Nevada law. We have jurisdiction under 8

U.S.C. § 1252. The petition for review is denied.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Kathryn H. Vratil, United States District Judge for the District of Kansas, sitting by designation. While living in…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.