Upper Skagit Indian Tribe v. Sauk-Suiattle Indian Tribe
66 F.4th 766
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202321-35985California5,026 words
Opinion
Opinion
Ikuta, J.
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
UPPER SKAGIT INDIAN TRIBE, No. 21-35985 Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. Nos. SWINOMISH INDIAN TRIBAL 2:20-sp-00001-
COMMUNITY, RSM
Intervenor-Plaintiff- 2:70-cv-09213- Appellee, RSM
v.
OPINION
SAUK-SUIATTLE INDIAN TRIBE,
Defendant-Appellant,
PUYALLUP TRIBE OF INDIANS,
Real-party-in-interest- Appellee,
and
STATE OF WASHINGTON;
TULALIP TRIBES; PORT GAMBLE
S'KLALLAM TRIBE; JAMESTOWN S'KLALLAM TRIBE; SKOKOMISH
INDIAN TRIBE; SQUAXIN ISLAND
TRIBE; HOH INDIAN TRIBE,
Real-party-in-interest. 2 UPPER SKAGIT V. SAUK-SUIATTLE
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Western District of Washington Ricardo S. Martinez, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted November 9, 2022 Seattle, Washington
Filed May 1, 2023
Before: Sandra S. Ikuta and Daniel P. Collins, Circuit Judges, and Sidney A. Fitzwater, * District Judge.
Opinion by Judge Ikuta
SUMMARY **
Tribal Fishing Rights
The panel affirmed the district court’s summary judgment in favor of the Upper Skagit Indian Tribe in a case…