Atud
Atud v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 1, 202321-1087California1,241 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 1 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
Wilson Fomunyoh Atud, No. 21-1087
Petitioner, Agency No. A201-742-974
v.
MEMORANDUM*
Merrick B. Garland, U.S. Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted March 14, 2023** Pasadena, California
Before: PAEZ, CHRISTEN, and MILLER, Circuit Judges.
Wilson Atud Fomunyoh (“Atud”) petitions for review of the denial of his
claims for asylum, withholding of removal, and protection under the
Convention Against Torture (“CAT”). Atud also challenges the finding that his
asylum claim was frivolous. Because the Board of Immigration Appeals
(“BIA”) adopted the immigration judge’s (“IJ”) decision but “did not merely
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). provide a…