Golden Fish v. FAA Beverly Hills BMW CA2/5

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 2023B314929California3,203 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/1/23 Golden Fish v. FAA Beverly Hills BMW CA2/5

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FIVE

GOLDEN FISH, LLC et al., B314929

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 20STCV12065) v.

FAA BEVERLY HILLS BMW et al.,

Defendants and Respondents.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Holly J. Fujie, Judge. Affirmed.

Law Offices of Pavel Y. Kouprine and Pavel Y. Kouprine for Plaintiff and Appellant.

Manning, Leaver, Bruder & Berberich, Kimberly L. Phan and Timothy D. Robinett for Defendants and Respondents. ___________________________ Plaintiffs Kirill Kiryanov and Golden Fish LLC (collectively, Kiryanov) purchased a BMW X7 from defendants FAA Beverly Hills, Inc.…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.