Toberoff & Associates v. Betancourt CA2/1

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 1, 2023B319116California6,869 words

Opinion

Opinion

Weingart, J.

Filed 5/1/23 Toberoff & Associates v. Betancourt CA2/1

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION ONE

TOBEROFF & ASSOCIATES, P.C., B319116

Plaintiff and Appellant, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 18SMCV00170) v.

JOHN BETANCOURT et al.,

Defendants and Appellants.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, H. Jay Ford III, Judge. Affirmed in part, reversed in part. Toberoff & Associates, Marc Toberoff and Jaymie Parkkinen for Plaintiff and Appellant. Bostwick Law, Gary L. Bostwick; Drooz Legal and Deborah Drooz for Defendants and Appellants John Betancourt and Wildside Press, LLC. Davis Wright Tremaine, Everett W. Jack, Jr., Eric M. Stahl and Zoë N. McKinney for Defendant and Appellant Blumhouse…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.