Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 2, 202321-1104California2,239 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 2 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ATINDERPAL SINGH, No. 21-1104 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-080-228 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted April 10, 2023 San Francisco, California

Before: PAEZ, CLIFTON, and H.A. THOMAS, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge CLIFTON.

Atinderpal Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of the

Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”) dismissal of his appeal of an

Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) decision denying his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and relief under the Convention Against Torture

(“CAT”). The BIA further denied his application for humanitarian asylum. We

have jurisdiction under 8 U.S.C. § 1252. We grant the petition.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. “Where, as here, the BIA agrees with the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.