John Doe 1 v. Twitter, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 3, 202322-15103California1,249 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 3 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, Nos. 22-15103

Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00485-JCS

v.

MEMORANDUM*

TWITTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellant.

JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, No. 22-15104

Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00485-JCS

v.

TWITTER, INC.,

Defendant-Appellee.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted April 20, 2023 San Francisco, California

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: VANDYKE and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and S. MURPHY,** District Judge.

On interlocutory cross-appeals, Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 and

Defendant Twitter, Inc. challenge the district court’s order granting in part and

denying in part Twitter’s motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ complaint. Specifically,

Plaintiffs challenge the district…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.