John Doe 1 v. Twitter, Inc.
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 3, 202322-15103California1,249 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 3 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, Nos. 22-15103
Plaintiffs-Appellees, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00485-JCS
v.
MEMORANDUM*
TWITTER, INC.,
Defendant-Appellant.
JOHN DOE #1; JOHN DOE #2, No. 22-15104
Plaintiffs-Appellants, D.C. No. 3:21-cv-00485-JCS
v.
TWITTER, INC.,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Joseph C. Spero, Magistrate Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted April 20, 2023 San Francisco, California
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. Before: VANDYKE and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and S. MURPHY,** District Judge.
On interlocutory cross-appeals, Plaintiffs John Doe #1 and John Doe #2 and
Defendant Twitter, Inc. challenge the district court’s order granting in part and
denying in part Twitter’s motion to dismiss the Plaintiffs’ complaint. Specifically,