Annotti

Annotti v. Ouita Martin CA6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 2023H049509California5,481 words

Opinion

Opinion

Grover, J.

I. BACKGROUND

Plaintiffs Gina Annotti and George Oliveira purchased a home in Hollister in 1998. They refinanced and executed a Deed of Trust in 2005. The 2005 Deed of Trust provides that the lender will apply plaintiffs’ payments in the following order: (1) prepayment charges; (2) advances; (3) taxes and insurance; (4) interest; (5) deferred interest; (6) principal; and (7) late charges. It also provides that the lender “may exercise the power of sale” in the event of a breach of duty by plaintiffs. Plaintiffs defaulted on their mortgage after the 2008 economic downturn left them unable to make their monthly payments. Their lender, Wells Fargo Bank, first recorded a notice of default in August 2009. Plaintiffs’ loan was then reinstated the day before a scheduled trustee’s sale. Wells Fargo recorded a second notice of default in July 2011 and cancelled that notice four months later. Finally, Wells Fargo recorded a third notice of default in April 2012. The April 2012 notice of default served as the “ ‘operative notice of default’ ” for the eventual nonjudicial foreclosure sale of plaintiffs’ home in May 2019. Between the April 2012 notice of default and the May 2019 trustee’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.