Young

Young v. Midland Funding LLC

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 3, 2023A161843ACalifornia16,196 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/3/23; Opinion following rehearing

CERTIFIED FOR PARTIAL PUBLICATION*

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FIRST APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION FOUR

KACIE LYNN YOUNG,

Plaintiff and Appellant, A161843, A162784 v. (San Mateo County Super. Ct. MIDLAND FUNDING LLC et al., No. 19-CIV-07622) Defendants and Respondents.

Kacie Lynn Young filed a complaint alleging that Midland Funding, LLC (Midland Funding) and Midland Credit Management, Inc. (MCM) (collectively the Midland parties) improperly pursued a debt collection lawsuit and obtained a default judgment against her for a delinquent credit account of $8,529.93. Included in her complaint were equitable causes of action for vacatur of the default judgment and a cause of action for damages under the Rosenthal Fair Debt Collection Practices Act (Rosenthal Act) (Civ. Code,1 § 1788 et seq.). Factually, the gist of all of her claims was that the Midland parties falsely and deceptively represented in the debt collection lawsuit that they effected substituted service of process on her, and then relied on this false representation to obtain the default…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.