Paulette Smith v. Edward Agdeppa

Good Law
66 F.4th 1199
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 202320-56254California272 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

PAULETTE SMITH, individually and No. 20-56254 as Successor in Interest to Albert Dorsey, deceased, D.C. No. 2:19-cv-05370- Plaintiff-Appellee, CAS-JC

v.

ORDER

EDWARD AGDEPPA, an individual,

Defendant-Appellant,

and

CITY OF LOS ANGELES, a municipal entity; DOES, 1 through 10,

Defendants.

Filed May 4, 2023

Before: Consuelo M. Callahan, Morgan Christen, and Daniel A. Bress, Circuit Judges. SUMMARY *

Civil Rights

In an action brought pursuant to 42 U.S.C. § 1983 alleging that a police officer used unreasonable deadly force when he shot and killed Albert Dorsey during a failed arrest in the men’s locker room of a gym, a majority of the panel sua sponte granted a petition for panel rehearing; denied as moot a petition for rehearing en banc; and ordered that the opinion and dissent filed on December 30, 2022, be withdrawn and that the case be resubmitted.

ORDER

The Honorable Gary Feinerman, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation, has resigned from judicial service and Judge Callahan was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.