Christina Pearson v. Apria Healthcare Group, Inc.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 4, 202321-55786California1,139 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 4 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CHRISTINA PEARSON, No. 21-55786

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 3:19-cv-02400-WQH-JLB v.

APRIA HEALTHCARE GROUP, INC.; MEMORANDUM*

ARSTRAT, LLC,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Southern District of California William Q. Hayes, District Judge, Presiding

Argued and Submitted March 7, 2023 Pasadena, California

Before: WATFORD and COLLINS, Circuit Judges, and S. MURPHY, III,** District Judge.

Appellant Christina Pearson sued Appellee Arstrat (ARS) under the Fair

Debt Collection Practices Act (FDCPA) and the California Rosenthal Fair Debt

Collection Practices Act (RFDCPA). Pearson also sued Appellee Apria Healthcare

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Stephen J. Murphy, III, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of Michigan, sitting by designation. Group under only the…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.