Fleming & Curti, PLC v. Dixon CA4/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 5, 2023G061043California3,380 words

Opinion

Opinion

Delaney, J.

Filed 5/5/23 Fleming & Curti, PLC v. Dixon CA4/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

FOURTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

FLEMING & CURTI, PLC,

Plaintiff and Respondent, G061043

v. (Super. Ct. No. 30-2019-01113636)

DAVID DIXON, OPI NION

Objector and Appellant.

Appeal from an order of the Superior Court of Orange County, Randell L. Wilkinson, Judge. Affirmed. Bunt & Shaver, and David N. Shaver for Objector and Appellant. Law Office of Robert E. Hales, R. Chad Hales, and Hart Kienle Pentecost, Andrew C. Kienle, and Rhonda H. Mehlman, for Plaintiff and Respondent.

* * * After Keith Alan Dixon died intestate, the public administrator sold…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.