Dawodu
Dawodu v. Meneses CA4/2
Opinion
Opinion
I.
INTRODUCTION
Toyin Dawodu appeals the trial court’s order striking his complaint as a strategic
lawsuit against public participation (SLAPP) under the anti-SLAPP statute, Code of Civil
Procedure section 425.16 (section 425.16). We affirm.
II.
1
FACTUAL AND PROCEDURAL BACKGROUND
Dawodu owns Guaranty Investment Company, Inc. (GIC). He alleges that GIC
bought a property in Cathedral City, where Nicole Pisciuneri was living at the time.
According to Dawodu, Pisciuneri agreed to rent the property but never paid any rent, so
GIC filed an unlawful detainer action against her (the UD action).
Pisciuneri received legal assistance from the Inland Empire Latino Lawyers
Association, Inc. (IELLA) and one of its attorneys, Gene Arthur Meneses, as well as
IELLA’s Executive Director, Sylvia Quistorf. Meneses represented Pisciuneri in the UD
action and successfully obtained judgment in her favor.
Pisciuneri later filed a lawsuit to quiet title to the property. She alleged that she
had lived at the property for 23 years and her deceased mother had gifted her the
1 The factual summary is drawn from Dawodu’s operative complaint and the parties’ evidence submitted in connection…