United States v. Carlos Cantizano

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 202319-10373California3,285 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 8 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 19-10373

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:14-cr-02097-JAS-JR-1 v.

CARLOS CANTIZANO, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona James Alan Soto, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 19, 2023** Phoenix, Arizona

Before: TALLMAN, OWENS, and BADE, Circuit Judges.

Carlos Cantizano appeals from his jury conviction and sentence for one

count of distribution of child pornography (Count 1) and one count of possession

of child pornography (Count 2). We have jurisdiction pursuant to 28 U.S.C.

§ 1291. As the parties are familiar with the facts, we do not recount them here.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). We affirm.

1. Rule…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.