David Elmore v. Hartford Life & Accident Ins.

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 8, 202320-55118California751 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 8 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DAVID ELMORE, an individual, No. 20-55118

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:18-cv-08903-CJC-JC v.

HARTFORD LIFE AND ACCIDENT MEMORANDUM*

INSURANCE COMPANY, a Connecticut corporation; DOES, 1-20, inclusive,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Cormac J. Carney, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 12, 2023** Pasadena, California

Before: W. FLETCHER, LEE, and MENDOZA, Circuit Judges.

David Elmore appeals the district court’s summary judgment order for

Hartford Life and Accident Insurance Co. (“Hartford Insurance”). We have

jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291 and we affirm.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Hartford Insurance terminated Elmore’s…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.