Andres Dominguez v. City of Scottsdale
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 8 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
ANDRES DOMINGUEZ, No. 22-15454
Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-00089-SRB-MTM v.
CITY OF SCOTTSDALE, a municipality; et MEMORANDUM* al.,
Defendants-Appellants.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Arizona Susan R. Bolton, District Judge, Presiding
Argued and Submitted March 7, 2023 Las Vegas, Nevada
Before: CLIFTON, BENNETT, and DESAI, Circuit Judges.
City of Scottsdale police officers Daniel Koller and Nikolas McElley
(“Officers”) appeal the district court’s denial of summary judgment on their
qualified immunity defense to Andres Dominguez’s 42 U.S.C. § 1983 excessive
force claim. The City of Scottsdale appeals the district court’s denial of summary
judgment on Dominguez’s state law negligent supervision and training claim against
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. the City. We affirm in part and dismiss in part.