Radical Studios v. Virk CA2/3

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 8, 2023B316278California3,220 words

Opinion

Opinion

Egerton, J.

Filed 5/8/23 Radical Studios v. Virk CA2/3

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION THREE

RADICAL STUDIOS, INC., B316278

Plaintiff and Respondent, Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. SC129304 v.

KAVI VIRK,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from a judgment of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County. Mark H. Epstein, Judge. Affirmed.

Matthew I. Berger Law Group and Matthew Ira Berger for Plaintiff and Respondent.

Kavi Virk, in pro. per., for Defendant and Appellant. _________________________ The trial court entered default judgment against Kavi Virk and his company, KSV, LLC, after they failed to answer Radical Studios, Inc.’s complaint. On appeal, Virk argues the court lacked jurisdiction over KSV, the judgment conflicts with…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.