Yongye Guo v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 9, 202317-72453California639 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 9 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

YONGYE GUO, No. 17-72453

Petitioner, Agency No. A099-329-223

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK GARLAND,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted March 27, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: GOULD and IKUTA, Circuit Judges, and KORMAN,*** District Judge.

Yongye Guo (“Guo”), a native and citizen of the People’s Republic of China

(“China”), petitions for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA”)

decision affirming an Immigration Judge’s (“IJ”) denial of his application for

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Edward R. Korman, United States District Judge for the Eastern District of New York, sitting by designation. asylum, withholding of removal, and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.