Rice

Rice v. Gulfstream Aerospace CA2/7

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 2023B316079California9,840 words

Opinion

Opinion

Filed 5/9/23 Rice v. Gulfstream Aerospace CA2/7

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opi ni ons not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SEVEN

ROBERT RICE, B316079

Plaintiff and Respondent, (Los Angeles County Super. Ct. No. 21LBCV00176) v.

GULFSTREAM AEROSPACE

CORPORATION,

Defendant and Appellant.

APPEAL from an order of the Superior Court of Los Angeles County, Michael P. Vicencia, Judge. Affirmed. Gibson Dunn & Crutcher, Scott A. Edelman, Jesse A. Cripps and Monica B. Paladini for Defendant and Appellant. Peretz & Associates, Yosef Peretz and Shane Howarter for Plaintiff and Respondent.

_______________________ Robert Rice was laid off from his employment at Gulfstream Aerospace Corporation (Gulfstream) on May 1, 2020. He sued Gulfstream for wrongful…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.