People v. Wildman CA2/6

Good Law
Court of Appeal of CaliforniaMay 9, 2023B323437California1,214 words

Opinion

Opinion

Yegan, J.

Filed 5/9/23 P. v. Wildman CA2/6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN THE OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SECOND APPELLATE DISTRICT

DIVISION SIX

THE PEOPLE, 2d Crim. No. B323437 (Super. Ct. No. 2010035171) Plaintiff and Respondent, (Ventura County)

v.

DANIEL CHARLES

WILDMAN,

Defendant and Appellant.

Daniel Charles Wildman appeals from a postjudgment order denying his “motion to stay restitution fines under newly enacted Assembly Bill[s] 177 and 1869.” (Bold and capitalization omitted.) In 2014 a jury convicted him of willful, deliberate, and premeditated murder (Pen. Code, §§ 187, subd. (a), 189, subd. (a)),1 and possession of a firearm by a felon (former § 12021, subd. (a)(1), now § 29800, subd. (a)(1)). The jury found true a firearm enhancement within the meaning of section…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.