Singh

Singh v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 202322-981California1,083 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 10 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

HARNEK SINGH, No. 22-981 Agency No. Petitioner, A205-935-145 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

HARNEK SINGH, No. 22-1850 Petitioner, Agency No.

A205-935-145

v.

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 8, 2023 ** San Francisco, California

Before: CHRISTEN and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON, District

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Judge.***

Harnek Singh, a native and citizen of India, petitions for review of a

decision of the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal of an

Immigration Judge (IJ) order denying his applications for…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.