Fuad

Fuad v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 202322-845California1,500 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 10 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

SHABBIR AHMED FUAD, No. 22-845 Agency No. Petitioner, A206-911-272 v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 8, 2023 ** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** Senior District Judge.

Petitioner Shabbir Ahmed Fuad (“Fuad”), a native and citizen of

Bangladesh, seeks review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’ (“BIA’s”) denial

of his untimely motion to reopen proceedings. The central issue raised by this

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States Senior District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. petition is whether…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.