Cardenas Parra v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 202322-319California415 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 10 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

CARLOS OMAR CARDENAS PARRA, No. 22-319

Petitioner, Agency No. A213-082-569

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 08, 2023 ** San Francisco, California

Before: FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.

Carlos Omar Cardenas Parra petitions for review of a Board of

Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order upholding an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)

denial of cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). Cardenas Parra

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. argues only that the IJ—and…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.