Cardenas Parra v. Garland
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 10, 202322-319California415 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 10 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
CARLOS OMAR CARDENAS PARRA, No. 22-319
Petitioner, Agency No. A213-082-569
v.
MEMORANDUM*
MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,
Respondent.
On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals
Submitted May 08, 2023 ** San Francisco, California
Before: FRIEDLAND and BENNETT, Circuit Judges, and BENNETT,*** District Judge.
Carlos Omar Cardenas Parra petitions for review of a Board of
Immigration Appeals (“BIA”) order upholding an immigration judge’s (“IJ”)
denial of cancellation of removal under 8 U.S.C. § 1229b(b). Cardenas Parra
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Richard D. Bennett, United States District Judge for the District of Maryland, sitting by designation. argues only that the IJ—and…