Kleidman

Filed 5/10/23 Kleidman v. Technology CA6

NOT TO BE PUBLISHED IN OFFICIAL REPORTS

California Rules of Court, rule 8.1115(a), prohibits courts and parties from citing or relying on opinions not certified for publication or ordered published, except as specified by rule 8.1115(b). This opinion has not been certified for publication or ordered published for purposes of rule 8.1115.

IN THE COURT OF APPEAL OF THE STATE OF CALIFORNIA

SIXTH APPELLATE DISTRICT

PETER KLEIDMAN, H049681

(Santa Clara County Plaintiff and Appellant, Super. Ct. No. 2013-1-CV247406)

v.

FEEVA TECHNOLOGY, INC.,

Defendant and Respondent.

This case arises out of a previous appeal filed by plaintiff Peter Kleidman in the same matter, where this court ruled in favor of defendant Feeva Technology, Inc. (Feeva), and awarded Feeva costs as the prevailing party.1 Feeva subsequently filed a memorandum requesting $2,065.50 in costs. Kleidman moved to tax $1,500 of the costs listed for printing and copying briefs on the basis that they were excessive and unnecessary in light of the number of briefs actually filed by Feeva. The trial court…