V.M.

V.M. v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202320-72563California1,273 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

V.M., No. 20-72563

Petitioner, Agency No. A074-378-938

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Argued and Submitted October 19, 2022 Portland, Oregon

Before: BADE and SANCHEZ, Circuit Judges, and LEFKOW,** District Judge.

V.M. 1, a native and citizen of Mexico, petitions for review of the order of

the Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissing his appeal from a decision of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The Honorable Joan H. Lefkow, United States District Judge for the Northern District of Illinois, sitting by designation.

We grant the remainder of V.M.’s unopposed motion to proceed under a 1

pseudonym and refer to petitioner by his pseudonym in this disposition. the Immigration Judge (IJ) denying his application for protection…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.