Maria Guardado v. Merrick Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202318-71255California808 words

Opinion

Opinion

FILED

NOT FOR PUBLICATION

MAY 11 2023

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

MARIA ADELINA GUARDADO; et al., No. 18-71255

Petitioners, Agency Nos. A206-700-188

A206-700-189

v. A206-700-190

MERRICK B. GARLAND, Attorney General, MEMORANDUM*

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 8, 2023** Pasadena, California

Before: KLEINFELD, HURWITZ, and R. NELSON, Circuit Judges.

Maria Guardado, Jorge Alvarez-Guardado, and Jennifer Alvarez-Guardado

petition for review of the Board of Immigration Appeals’s decision affirming an

immigration judge’s denials of their applications for asylum, withholding of

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). removal, protection under the Convention Against…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.