Julie Dinwiddie v. United States
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202321-35368California441 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
JULIE DINWIDDIE, No. 21-35368
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 1:18-cv-00197-SEH
v.
MEMORANDUM *
UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, Internal Revenue Service,
Defendant-Appellee.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the District of Idaho Sam E. Haddon, District Judge, Presiding
Submitted May 9, 2023** Seattle, Washington
Before: HAWKINS, TALLMAN, and IKUTA, Circuit Judges.
Julie Dinwiddie appeals the adverse grant of summary judgment in this
wrongful levy action. We have jurisdiction under 28 U.S.C. § 1291. We review de
novo, Opara v. Yellen, 57 F.4th 709, 721 (9th Cir. 2023), and affirm.
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). Contrary to Julie’s contentions, the United States Internal Revenue Service
(“IRS”) permissibly levied her…