Darlene Hollins v. Walmart Inc.
67 F.4th 1011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202321-56031California8,030 words
Opinion
Opinion
FOR PUBLICATION
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
DARLENE HOLLINS; CHRISTIAN No. 21-56031
LEMUS; ALAIN MICHAEL;
MARIE ANGELINE FALCONE, D.C. No. Individually and on Behalf of All 2:19-cv-05526- Others Similarly Situated,
SVW-GJS
Plaintiffs-Appellants, and
OPINION
ANGELA DIAMOS,
Plaintiff, v.
WALMART INC.;
INTERNATIONAL VITAMIN
CORPORATION,
Defendants-Appellees.
Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding 2 HOLLINS V. WALMART, INC.
Argued and Submitted November 22, 2022 Pasadena, California
Filed May 11, 2023
Before: Danny J. Boggs,* Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.
Opinion by Judge Ikuta; Partial Dissent by Judge Wardlaw
SUMMARY **
Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act
The panel affirmed the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Walmart Inc. in a consumer class action alleging that Walmart’s product, Spring Valley Glucosamine Sulfate, contained glucosamine hydrochloride, not glucosamine sulfate or glucosamine sulfate potassium chloride, and that the plaintiffs were…