Darlene Hollins v. Walmart Inc.

Good Law
67 F.4th 1011
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202321-56031California8,030 words

Opinion

Opinion

FOR PUBLICATION

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

DARLENE HOLLINS; CHRISTIAN No. 21-56031

LEMUS; ALAIN MICHAEL;

MARIE ANGELINE FALCONE, D.C. No. Individually and on Behalf of All 2:19-cv-05526- Others Similarly Situated,

SVW-GJS

Plaintiffs-Appellants, and

OPINION

ANGELA DIAMOS,

Plaintiff, v.

WALMART INC.;

INTERNATIONAL VITAMIN

CORPORATION,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Stephen V. Wilson, District Judge, Presiding 2 HOLLINS V. WALMART, INC.

Argued and Submitted November 22, 2022 Pasadena, California

Filed May 11, 2023

Before: Danny J. Boggs,* Kim McLane Wardlaw, and Sandra S. Ikuta, Circuit Judges.

Opinion by Judge Ikuta; Partial Dissent by Judge Wardlaw

SUMMARY **

Federal Food, Drug, and Cosmetic Act

The panel affirmed the district court’s order granting summary judgment for Walmart Inc. in a consumer class action alleging that Walmart’s product, Spring Valley Glucosamine Sulfate, contained glucosamine hydrochloride, not glucosamine sulfate or glucosamine sulfate potassium chloride, and that the plaintiffs were…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.