Veronica McCluskey v. William Hendricks

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202322-55124California1,247 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

VERONICA MCCLUSKEY, No. 22-55124

Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:21-cv-01188-MWF-MRW v.

WILLIAM HENDRICKS; ROXANNE MEMORANDUM*

HENDRICKS,

Defendants-Appellees.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Central District of California Michael W. Fitzgerald, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted April 19, 2023** Pasadena, California

Before: WARDLAW and KOH, Circuit Judges, and MCMAHON,*** District Judge.

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable Colleen McMahon, United States District Judge for the Southern District of New York, sitting by designation. Veronica McCluskey (“McCluskey”) appeals the dismissal of her action

against William and Roxanne Hendricks (the “Hendricks”). McCluskey filed…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.