United States v. David Cervantes

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202322-10093California744 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA, No. 22-10093

Plaintiff-Appellee, D.C. No. 4:21-cr-00328-YGR-1 v.

DAVID CERVANTES, AKA DC, MEMORANDUM*

Defendant-Appellant.

Appeal from the United States District Court for the Northern District of California Yvonne Gonzalez Rogers, District Judge, Presiding

Submitted May 9, 2023** San Francisco, California

Before: CHRISTEN and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON,*** District Judge.

David Cervantes appeals from the district court’s order denying his motion

to quash a writ of habeas corpus ad prosequendum. Pursuant to the writ, Cervantes

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Antoon II, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. was…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.