Terence Tekoh v. County of Los Angeles
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202318-56414California1,711 words
Opinion
Opinion
NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED
UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2023
MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK
U.S. COURT OF APPEALS
FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT
TERENCE B. TEKOH, No. 18-56414
Plaintiff-Appellant, D.C. No. 2:16-cv-07297-GW-SK v.
COUNTY OF LOS ANGELES; DENNIS MEMORANDUM*
STANGELAND, Sergeant; CARLOS VEGA, Deputy,
Defendants-Appellees,
and
LOS ANGELES COUNTY SHERIFF'S DEPARTMENT; DOES, 1 to 10,
Defendants.
On Remand from the United States Supreme Court
Before: MURGUIA, Chief Judge, and WARDLAW and MILLER, Circuit Judges. Dissent by Judge MILLER.
Following a federal trial, Terence Tekoh appealed the district court’s
decisions to (1) instruct the jury that a § 1983 claim could not be grounded in a
Miranda violation alone, and (2) exclude the testimony of Tekoh’s coerced
* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. confessions expert, Dr. Iris Blandón-Gitlin. We ruled in favor of Tekoh on the
Miranda issue, but the Supreme Court reversed that decision. See Vega v. Tekoh,
142 S. Ct.…