Kumar

Kumar v. Garland

Good Law
United States Court of Appeals for the Ninth CircuitMay 11, 202322-1124California516 words

Opinion

Opinion

NOT FOR PUBLICATION FILED

UNITED STATES COURT OF APPEALS MAY 11 2023

MOLLY C. DWYER, CLERK

U.S. COURT OF APPEALS

FOR THE NINTH CIRCUIT

ANKUSH KUMAR, No. 22-1124

Petitioner, Agency No. A216-274-177

v.

MEMORANDUM*

MERRICK B. GARLAND, U.S. Attorney General,

Respondent.

On Petition for Review of an Order of the Board of Immigration Appeals

Submitted May 09, 2023 ** San Francisco, California

Before: CHRISTEN and BRESS, Circuit Judges, and ANTOON,*** District Judge.

The Board of Immigration Appeals (BIA) dismissed Ankush Kumar’s

appeal of an Immigration Judge’s (IJ) denial of his applications for asylum,

withholding of removal, and protection under the Convention Against Torture

* This disposition is not appropriate for publication and is not precedent except as provided by Ninth Circuit Rule 36-3. ** The panel unanimously concludes this case is suitable for decision without oral argument. See Fed. R. App. P. 34(a)(2). *** The Honorable John Antoon II, United States District Judge for the Middle District of Florida, sitting by designation. (CAT). Kumar, a…

Sign in to read the full opinion

Create a free account to read the complete opinion text, citation history, and good-law status for this case.